Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)

kramer vs kramer

By Richard Winters

My Rating: 10 out of 10

4-Word Review: Life after wife leaves.

This is a solid drama detailing the divorce and subsequent custody battle between two young, educated and upper middle class parents (Dustin Hoffman, Meryl Streep).

To say that this is simply an examination of divorce and its effects on both the child and parents do not do the film justice as this is a very richly textured story that brings out the many variables that come with being a modern day parent. One of the best is the examination of Hoffman’s character’s job and how ‘moving up the corporate ladder’ can have an adverse effect on a man’s home life and his family members. In fact this is a major factor to his break-up and emotional detachment with his wife.

The film also offers a nice glimpse between father and son and the scenes showing this relationship are quite touching especially as they learn to coexist with one another after the mother leaves. Justin Henry doesn’t get enough credit for his performance as the son. Yes, he is adorable in the typical child-like way, but he also manages to create a child character that is diverse and memorable.

Hoffman gives a superior performance and in many ways it is all about him and his adjustment at playing the dual roles of being both a father and mother. He has his aggressive New Yorker persona, but you understand it and really feel for what he is going through. Even watching him frantically running around from place-to-place is interesting.

Streep is also outstanding in what is kind of an unusual role for her. Typically she plays strong-willed women with a strong on-screen presence, but here her character is rather weak and suffers from problems that are elusive, but still intriguing.

Howard Duff is solid as Hoffman’s attorney and Jane Alexander offers good support as the next-door-neighbor although her character is a bit too ordinary and could have been supplied with a few interesting quirks.

The subject itself is still quite topical and everything is kept in a real perspective with nothing getting overblown or clichéd.  Robert Benton’s direction is flawless as it pays attention to the smallest of details and makes them special.  A good example of this is the poor way the father and son try to make French toast when they first find themselves alone together and then the very efficient way they learn to make them at the end. It is also not all serious as there is a really hilarious scene involving Jobeth Williams who plays Hoffman’s new girlfriend and the unusual circumstances onto which she first meets Henry.

There are a few issues to quibble about, but they are minor. One is that you hear Hoffman and Henry peeing in the toilet a lot, but they never seem able to flush it! There is also a scene where Hoffman who is in desperate need for a job applies for one during a holiday party and when he gets it he runs out, grabs a woman he does not know and kisses her right on the lips. If he tried something like that today he would not only be fired on the spot, but have a sexual harassment lawsuit as well.

My Rating: 10 out of 10

Released: December 19, 1979

Runtime: 1Hour 45Minutes

Rated PG

Director: Robert Benton

Studio: Columbia Pictures

Available: VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, Amazon Instant Video

5 responses to “Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)

  1. Tedious soaper that descends into a courtroom drama. Didn’t deserve the praise or awards it received.

    • I can think of a lot of TV and movie dramas that are needlessly soapy, even with enough things that could still be subjectively enjoyed about them. For a courtroom drama, I gave enough points on its subject matter for how gender roles for parents can be easily stigmatized. Because to some degree it may still be a common problem. Dustin’s dialogue in that regard on the stand is fairly effective. I certainly give points for how it helped to put Meryl Streep on the map.

  2. Joseph Kearny's avatar Joseph Kearny

    Uses the courtroom to depict the couples relationship rather than through dramatization. I’d rather watch Perry Mason!

    • Michael Caine once stated at the Oscars that true drama may not always need battlefields, disasters or spectacles. Courtroom dramas might not so easily achieve that, certainly in reflection of the Law & Order shows and movies like To Kill A Mockingbird, The Verdict and Primal Fear. I could certainly enjoy Perry Mason when I’m in the mood for a good mystery. But for a story about how facing our relationship issues in the courtroom, I suppose that Kramer vs Kramer had some significant appeals for whoever can visually tolerate such a story.

  3. Your closing sentence is food for thought when we reflect on film scenes that seemed tolerable for their times, but today would be so seriously criticized. Thanks for your review.

Leave a comment